L61 vs L62 vs L63 vs L64: EO/PO Block Polyether Selection Guide

EO/PO block polyether selection · Procurement guide

L61, L62, L63 or L64: the short answer

Start with the required function and operating conditions, then compare the exact grade specifications. Do not choose an L-series block polyether from its code or HLB alone. Kemaix lists L61, L62, L63 and L64 within its existing EO/PO block-polyether collection. Molecular weight, viscosity, cloud point, water compatibility and formulation testing all matter.

Compare the Kemaix EO/PO block-polyether collection and current published grade table.

What should you compare across L61–L64?

Use the same measurement conditions for each candidate
PropertyQuestion for the supplierDecision it supports
Grade identityWhat is the exact product designation and composition covered by the TDS and SDS?Establish that the quoted material matches the requested grade.
Molecular weight and HLBAre values typical references or specification limits, and how are they determined?Screen the balance between water compatibility and the intended formulation function.
ViscosityWhat temperature and measurement method apply?Compare handling, pumping and dosing requirements under relevant conditions.
Cloud pointWhat concentration, medium, method and endpoint were used?Avoid comparing values measured under different procedures.
Batch documentationWhich limits are agreed for supply, and what does the batch COA report?Separate screening data from acceptance criteria.

Keep cloud-point comparisons method-aware

A cloud-point number without its test conditions is incomplete. For example, BASF’s industrial product guides distinguish cloud-point methods and specify the test medium. That is a useful reminder to request the procedure when reviewing any supplier’s EO/PO grade data.

For Kemaix grades: request the current TDS before using a published table value to set a process temperature or purchasing limit. Check concentration, medium and method together. A similarity between trade codes does not establish equivalence between suppliers.

A practical screening workflow

  1. Write the requirement. State whether the priority is foam control, low-foam cleaning, wetting, dispersion or another function. Record temperature, pH, electrolytes and relevant formulation components.
  2. Shortlist from current documents. Review L61, L62, L63 and L64 in the same product collection. Confirm the exact specification and availability before requesting samples.
  3. Compare under one test procedure. Keep concentration, temperature, mixing conditions and the base formulation consistent. Record initial behavior and the result after the relevant operating period.
  4. Check downstream effects. Review phase separation, residue, filtration or material compatibility where relevant. For foam-control projects, evaluate the dose-response and persistence in the actual process.
  5. Agree purchasing criteria. Confirm grade, specification limits, packaging, quantity, destination, documents and sample or delivery terms in writing.

Common selection mistakes

  • Assuming L61–L64 are separate product families rather than grades within one collection.
  • Treating the highest HLB or highest cloud point as universally preferable.
  • Comparing viscosity or cloud-point values without their measurement conditions.
  • Claiming one supplier’s material is an exact substitute based only on a similar trade name.
  • Using a typical series value as a guaranteed batch-release limit.

Questions buyers often ask

Are L61, L62, L63 and L64 separate product pages?

At Kemaix they are grades within the EO/PO block-polyether collection. The collection page provides their published specification rows and links for grade review.

Can one grade replace another directly?

Do not assume a direct replacement. Compare identity, current specifications and behavior in the complete formulation before qualification.

Which documents should I request?

Request the current grade-specific TDS and SDS and available batch COA information. Confirm the applicable methods, specification limits and intended-use requirements.

Request an L-series grade review

Send the requested grade or target properties, application, process conditions, quantity and destination. List the documents and sample requirements you need; availability and supply terms are confirmed individually.

Request L-series documents and quotation

Sources and scope

Compiled 12 October 2026 from public supplier information. This guide provides a screening and procurement workflow; it does not report new laboratory measurements. Pluronic® is a BASF trademark; no affiliation or grade equivalence is implied.

Picture of Grace Dou

Grace Dou

Grace Dou is a technical content reviewer at Nanjing Kemaix Advanced Materials Co., Ltd., focusing on EO/PO derivatives, nonionic surfactants, formulation scope, test conditions and documentation boundaries. Final grade selection should use current specifications and finished-formula testing.

Scroll to Top